Correction mismatch? Do inattention and selective exposure limit the effects of media-led voter fraud debunking?
Misinformation Speaker Series
Jason Reifler
Professor of Political Science at University of Southampton
Past Talk
Virtual
Thursday
Oct 17, 2024
Watch video
11:00 am
EST
Virtual
177 Huntington Ave.
11th floor
Devon House
58 St Katharine's Way
London E1W 1LP, UK
Online
Register here
Why are high-profile misperceptions so persistent? Accurate information is widely available online and yet false and unsupported claims about issues like climate change and health care endure for years. This disjunction, we argue, is caused by ``correction mismatch'' --- people's lack of exposure to relevant correction information, which has been demonstrated to reduce misperceptions in past experiments. We examine this phenomenon in the context of false claims of widespread voter fraud with U.S. data from 2020--2022. Results using nationally representative experimental and observational data indicate that exposure to corrective information reduces fraud misperceptions. Turning to online behavior data we examine exposure to fraud claims at the article level and try to estimate to how often people encountered corrective information from fact-checkers or in mainstream news, especially among people who are predisposed to believe in these claims. The persistence of misperceptions, in other words, may be driven more by the information that people encounter than by their response when they encounter it.
About the speaker
About the speaker